Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Inex-Adria crew on 
DC-9 (YU-AJT), 1980

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May81
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Jat begins fleet renewal

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
fAirbus and Jat Airways negotiations begin
Today, Jat Airways will begin talks to renew its aging fleet of Boeing B737s and ATR72s for the first time since 1998. The delegation from Airbus will be arriving in Belgrade today to discuss the order made by Jat more than a decade ago for 8 Airbus A319s. In 1998 the Yugoslav government made the order which was extremely damaging to the Serbian carrier. This was revealed after the fall of the government in late 2000. The aircrafts were extremely expensive and although Jat has already paid millions for the aircraft it owes much more. Jat no longer wants the aircraft, which were never delivered and in 2006 tried to offer the order to another carrier. No airline was willing to accept and Jat has been left with the order for many years. Now there is hope that the Airbus deal can be resolved. Jat’s management also named the 3 member team which will, in June, travel to the Paris Air Show to carry out negotiations with aircraft manufacturers. The team will be made up of pilot and instructor Nenad Petrović and vice presidents of Jat’s board of directors Tanja Jovanović and Mića Jovanović. Jat will receive a total of 4 new aircraft in 2010.

On Monday, June 1, the airline’s management officially passed the plan for a new visual look as well as a new name for the Serbian carrier, to be applied in 2010. The airline’s management also announced that all sectors of Jat will have younger employees replacing current ones, something which will not go down well with the unions within Jat, especially cabin crew. From tomorrow evening Jat will have a new CEO. The Serbian government will, during its usual Thursday afternoon ministry meeting, select and name the airline’s new CEO.

Meanwhile, a resolution to the war between Jat Airways and Turkish charter companies is nowhere in sight. The Turkish government will not issue a licence to Jat to begin charter flights to Antalya while the Serbian Civil Aviation Directorate will not issue licenses to a total of 6 Turkish charter companies wanting to begin flights to Belgrade. Many Serbian tourists travelling to Turkey with Jat this summer are anxious to see a resolution to this problem. Jat’s management has said that if the airline does not receive a license for charter flights to Turkey it will apply for a license for regular flights between Belgrade and Antalya. Reports also suggest that the Serbian national carrier has received the green light from the Croatian Civil Aviation Agency to commence flights to Dubrovnik from July this year.

June 03, 2009
Fleet Jat Airways serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. frequentflyer15:36

    A new airbus fleet may not be such a bad thing for JAT (or whatever they're going to be called next year). Replacing 120-seat ageing 737s with fuel efficient 130- or 140-seat 319s could actually prove a cost saving/profit to them!

    How much money was already spent/put as a deposit? Was it a serious investment? And why wouldn't any other airline take over JAT's order of 8 319s?

    Is it they don't want the aircraft because they feel they have been harshly done by, or they genuinely wish to keep one of the major global aircraft makers out of business, especially one run by an organisation Serbia may wish to join in the future (aka the EU), then it may be time to put the tissues away and stop sulking. That said, it may actually be a very sensible reason.

    This is good progress that they're talking, but perplexing.

    Could any fleet orders that JAT makes go to MAT (of which then, shouldn't more new planes have been ordered)? Or will we see MAT get its old fleet back from the lessors?

    In the other matter listed about charter flights, OSI and connecting 90-min bus trip is a good alternative if they can't get in at BEG (as Lotus Air have chosen from Egypt).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous00:03

    There's no chance in hell Jat will be taking any of those Airbus'. That contract is signed by blood - the ex Serbian PM who signed the contract is dead, if he weren't, he'd be sat in a prison in The Hague.

    The visit is nothing more than a 'courtesy' visit, and these are typical bi-annual events.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. idk03:59

    Plus, I heard ealier Jat prefers Boeing planes especially due to the fact that most Jat pilots are more accustomed to the Boeing cockpits/controls than the Airbus ones.

    In my opinion, Jat definetly needs a plan to replace those really old 737s. The planes are already 23-24 years old, right? It's only a matter of time before their D checks will cost about the same or even more than the frames themselves, and it would potentially be financial suicide if Jat were forced to keep using these planes if an event like this were to happen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. EX-YU Aviation09:56

    @ frequenttflyer, the deal with Airbus amounts to 580 million US dollars. Jat has deposited 23.5 million so far. No airline wanted to take the order because they find it extremely expensive. The entire deal is very murky as were most things at the time and ir is believed that Airbus also didn't play fair. Because of the nature of the deal no changes can be maid to it. Furthermore Jat would not own any of the aircraft until the total 580 million would be paid. If Jat maid regular payments from the beginning it would have been the owner of the aircraft in 2015 (17 years after the order and 15 years after the first expected delivery). Also, as one reader says Jat pilots do not see this as a good deal because they are used to Boeing aircraft and Jat Tehnika has no Airbus spare parts which would also have to be bought.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Q40011:06

    Also, I think Boeing had plans to establish a service centre in Belgrade. If I can remember correctly, this could have been one of the reasons why Jat did no go ahead with the deal at that time.

    I do not know if Boeing still have these plans but I also remember people in Croatia were upset that OU went to Airbus and did not go Boeing in the hope that Boeing might consider Zagreb over Belgrade. Anyway this could be very old new now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. Q40011:07

    Old news now (is what I ment to say)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. frequentflyer15:27

    Thanks ex-YU and Q400.

    Even Blind Freddy could see that $570m was a rip-off then (even now with the average price of a singluar new 319 around $70m, and better prices for buying in bulk), so is the contract so iron-clad that all the money invested is forever lost? $23.5m would buy you a new Sukhoi 100 or even an ATR72 with change!!

    The best solution would be that Airbus uses that money already paid by JAT for a new contract at much reasonable levels. Both sides would gain from the experience and could retreat without losing face.

    It's not impossible for an airline to change its fleet, but somehow though from reading the above notes it probably won't happen!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. EX-YU Aviation16:02

    They have had huge problems with Airbus over the past years and I assume the public doesn’t even know half of the story. Your observations are correct but we will have to wait and see what happens. Overall it can be seen what a very bad deal this was

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. Anonymous19:29

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  10. Anonymous01:37

    Dear Ex-YU aviation:

    With all due respect, you're merely guessing at the details and reality of the Airbus contract based on media speculation. Your assertion of the price, or the relationship between Airbus & Jat, plus the comments on the Jat Tehnika 'issues' - are all totally wrong. Sorry.

    Do you really think that Airbus would have sold planes to Jat without a support clause in the contract that would have included training and certification courses for the mechanics? (Getting a depot of spare A319 parts is the least complicated aspect of changing to a new fleet type)

    Please respond constructively rather than merely deleting posts that don't you agree with, otherwise you're devaluing the objectivity of your own site.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  11. EX-YU Aviation05:55

    Your comment was deleted due to your overall tone and it was the first comment that was ever deleted from here. The news item is based on media reports. Nowhere in here does it say that this is some sort of exclusive or insider news. The price of the deal has been disclosed by many of Jat’s CEO (present and past) as well as the government so we can only speculate that it is true. Yesterday evening the Union of Serbian Aircraft Mechanics released a statement: “Želimo samo da upozorimo NA vreme šta se može desiti ako nespremni dočekamo dolazak novih aviona. poučeni iskustvom možemo samo da pretpostavimo da ćemo se opet u nekom trenutku, kada dođu novi avioni hvatati za glavu optužujući jedni druge ko je za šta više kriv. Upozoravamo da JAT Tehnika nije opremljena za rad na Erbasovima, da nemamo školovanog kadra bilo kog profila kao i to da će se onda postavlja pitanje samog ugovora sa JAT Airways-om ukoliko nabavi novu flotu koju mi za sada ne možemo da održavamo!” So as you can see there is obviously a problem there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Inex-Adria crew on 
DC-9 (YU-AJT), 1980

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Air Serbia considering new mid-haul markets

Image

Air Serbia gains access to Trans-Siberian air corridor

Image

Lufthansa to suspend Skopje service for part of winter

Image

Belgrade Airport activates new rapid exit taxiways

Image

Ljubljana Airport targets growth of over 5%, eyes new routes

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025